Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 
About FDsys
Search Government Publications
Browse Government Publications
FDsys Tutorials and Webinars
  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
Actions
 

14-1812 - Painters District Council No. 58 et al v. RDB Universal Services, LLC et al

Download Files
Descriptive Metadata MODS
Authenticity Metadata PREMIS
All Format & Metadata Files ZIP file
Metadata
CategoryMouse over help for Category says The category to which the collection belongs. Search field operator example is category:"Judicial Publications".Judicial Publications
CollectionMouse over help for Collection says The collection to which the document belongs. Typically the same as the publication or series. Search field operator example is collection:uscourts. United States Courts Opinions
SuDoc Class NumberMouse over help for SuDoc Class Number says The SuDoc class number from the U.S. Superintendent of Documents which classifies Government publications by publishing agency. Search field operator example is sudocclass:"JU 4.15:".JU 4.15
Court TypeMouse over help for Court Type says The type of court, such as appellate, district, or bankruptcy. Search field operator example is courttype:district.District
Court NameMouse over help for Court Name says The name of the court. Search field operator example is courtname:"United States District Court District of Maryland".United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri
CircuitMouse over help for Circuit says There are currently 11 circuits, plus the D.C. and Federal circuits. Search field operator example is circuit:4th. 8th
Office LocationMouse over help for Office Location says The city where the office is located. Search field operator example is officelocation:Baltimore.St. Louis
Case TypeMouse over help for Case Type says District cases can either be criminal or civil. Search field operator example is casetype:criminal. civil
Nature of SuitMouse over help for Nature of Suit says The nature of the suit for appellate or district cases. Search field operator example is naturesuit:foreclosure. The CIT uses statutory references to 28 U.S.C. 1581-1584 in lieu of nature of suit codes. Search field operator example is naturesuit:antidumping.Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
CauseMouse over help for Cause says The cause in a district court case. Search field operator example is cause:"Right to Privacy Act".29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Party NamesMouse over help for Party Names says The names of the parties in the case. Search field operator example is partyname:"State of Rhode Island".Deloris Berry, Counter Claimant
Relder Berry, Counter Claimant
RDB Universal Services, LLC, Counter Claimant
William Boevingloh, Counter Defendant
Mark Borgmann, Counter Defendant
David Doerr, Counter Defendant
Carl Farrell, Counter Defendant
Daniel Hanson, Counter Defendant
Joseph Keipp, Counter Defendant
Rich Lucks, Counter Defendant
Painters District Council No. 2 Apprenticeship and Journeyman Training Trust, Counter Defendant
Painters District Council No. 2 Pension Trust, Counter Defendant
Painters District Council No. 2 Vacation Trust, Counter Defendant
Painters District Council No. 2 Welfare Trust, Counter Defendant
Painters District Council No. 58, Counter Defendant
Fred Phillipp Jr., Counter Defendant
Steve Phillipp Jr., Counter Defendant
Michael Slattery, Counter Defendant
Gregg Smith, Counter Defendant
Michael Smith, Counter Defendant
Donald Thomas, Counter Defendant
Daniel Weinstroer, Counter Defendant
Tim Weis, Counter Defendant
Deloris Berry, Defendant
Relder Berry, Defendant
RDB Universal Services, LLC, Defendant
William Boevingloh, Plaintiff
Mark Borgmann, Plaintiff
David Doerr, Plaintiff
Carl Farrell, Plaintiff
Daniel Hanson, Plaintiff
Joseph Keipp, Plaintiff
Rich Lucks, Plaintiff
Painters District Council No. 2, Plaintiff
Painters District Council No. 2 Apprenticeship and Journeyman Training Trust, Plaintiff
Painters District Council No. 2 Pension Trust, Plaintiff
Painters District Council No. 2 Vacation Trust, Plaintiff
Painters District Council No. 2 Welfare Trust, Plaintiff
Painters District Council No. 58, Plaintiff
Fred Phillipp Jr., Plaintiff
Steve Phillipp Jr., Plaintiff
Michael Slattery, Plaintiff
Gregg Smith, Plaintiff
Michael Smith, Plaintiff
Donald Thomas, Plaintiff
Daniel Weinstroer, Plaintiff
Tim Weis, Plaintiff
Document in Context
14-1812 - Painters District Council No. 58 et al v. RDB Universal Services, LLC et al
More
July 15, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' "Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim" [ECF No. 33] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file an Answer to the counterclaims within twenty days. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 07/15/2015. (CBL)
September 17, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaim or for a more definitive statement [ECF No. 38] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an answer or other responsive pleadings to Defendants' counterclaims within ten (10) days. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 9/17/2015. (CBL)
April 6, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED in PART and DENIED in part. [ECF No. 48].IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, on the issue of whether Defendant RDB Universal is bound to a Collective Bargaining Agreement as explained in the above memorandum. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, finding Defendants Deloris Berry and Relder Berry are bound as individuals through the terms of the Guaranty referenced in the above memorandum. [ECF No. 49-13].IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants counterclaims of tortious interference and breach of contract are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED on Defendants' Relder Berry and Deloris Berry counterclaims of money had and received, and DENIED for Defendant RDB Universals counterclaim of money had and received. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment in all other respects relating to their claims is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Demand for a Trial by Jury is hereby DENIED. [ECF No. 34]. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 4/6/16. (EAB)
August 16, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration and to Clarify Court's Order Granting and Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment in Part [ECF No. 71] is hereby GRANTED in PART and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration, on the issue of the specific CBA in effect does not affect Defendants liability is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration, on the issue of a renewed audit by Plaintiffs is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration, on whether Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted or denied with respect to Defendants' claims of tortious interference of contract or business expectancy and breach of contract is GRANTED [ECF No. 71], and after reconsideration, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to Defendants' claims of tortious interference of contract or business expectancy and breach of contract. [ECF No. 48]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration, with respect to Summary Judgment of RDB's counterclaim of money had and received is GRANTED [ECF No. 71], and after reconsideration, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with respect to RDB's counterclaim of money had and received. [ECF No. 48]. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 8/16/2016. (CBL)
May 24, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment shall be entered on behalf of Plaintiffs and against Defendant RDB Universal Services, LLC, as follows; IT IS ORDERED that Defendant RDB Universal Services, LLC shall pay Plaintiffs $271,271.69; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall inform the Court within twenty days of this order whether they wish to dismiss this action against Defendants Deloris and Relder Berry or proceed in a different manner; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant RDB Universal Services, LLC shall pay Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs, the amount to be determined by the Court after Plaintiff has filed appropriate supporting documents.An Order of Judgment will be issued together with this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on May 24, 2017. (MCB)
September 14, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs [ECF No. 113] is GRANTED and Plaintiffs shall be awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $75,965.45 and costs in the amount of $2,417.26. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 9/14/17. (EAB)