Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-714 - Jackson v. Asplundh Construction Corp. et al.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-714 - Jackson v. Asplundh Construction Corp. et al.
September 8, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. [ECF No. 45]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Counts II and III are dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 9/8/2016. (CBL)
September 8, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Designation of William E. Hampton as an Expert is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part. [ECF No. 43]; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff's expert is prohibited from opinion testimony that Defendants' violated federal laws or regulations and is prohibited from opining on the ultimate issue in this case on the basis of Defendant Rogerss vision. [ECF No. 43]; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Defendants' Expert Francis Oldham is DENIED. [ECF No. 56]; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Opinions 1-7 of Defendants' Expert Stephen Chewning is DENIED. [ECF No. 58]. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 9/8/2016. (CBL)
October 13, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Defendant Anthony Rogers' Prior Criminal Conviction or Sex Offender Status [ECF No. 76] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine to Preclude "Reptile Theory" Argument or Evidence [ECF No. 77] is held in abeyance. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine to Preclude William Hampton's Hearsay Testimony on Conversations and Site Visit with Potosi Police Chief Roy Logsden [ECF No. 80] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Consolidated Motions in Limine [ECF No. [ 81] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions in Limine [ECF No. 84] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate Punitive Damages at Trial [ECF No. 68] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that and Defendants' Motion in Limine Requesting Exclusion or in the Alternative Limiting of Plaintiff's Testimony of Injury and Causation by Virtue of the "Sudden Onset" Doctrine [ECF No. 92] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 10/13/16. (EAB)