Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-996 - Peoples National Bank, N.A. v. Mehlman et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-996 - Peoples National Bank, N.A. v. Mehlman et al
October 21, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED. (Doc. No. 19.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for limited expedited discovery is DENIED. (Doc. No. 21.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 10/21/2015. (NEB)
December 9, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants motion to quash the discovery subpoenas noted above is DENIED. (Doc. No. 51.) At Defendants request, the parties shall confer and attempt to reach an agreement on a protective order to protect confidential information. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, Defendants may submit a proposed protective order, on or before December 15, 2015, for the Courts consideration. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 12/09/2015. (KCB)
January 28, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants motion for entry of a protective order (Doc. No. 58) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs proposed version of the protective order shall be entered in this case by separate document. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 01/28/2016. (KCB)
June 7, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to quash is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 65.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to compel, as further limited by Plaintiffs memorandum, is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 68.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before June 17, 2016, the parties shall submit a joint proposed scheduling plan for the continued litigation of this case. Only one proposed scheduling plan may be submitted, and it must be signed by counsel for all parties. It will be the responsibility of counsel for Plaintiff to actually submit the joint proposed scheduling plan to the Court. If the parties cannot agree as to any matter required to be contained in the joint plan, the disagreement must be set out clearly in the joint proposal, and the Court will resolve the dispute. ( Joint Scheduling Plan due by 6/17/2016.). Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 6/7/2016. (NEB)
November 18, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion (Doc. No. 82) for leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED. The Clerk's Office is directed to detach the proposed amended complaint (Doc. 82-1) and docket it as Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall obtain prompt service of process on the newly-named Defendants, and shall notify the Court when all newlynamed Defendants have been served. Within ten days of an answer or other responsive pleading by these Defendants, the parties shall file a new joint proposed scheduling plan for the continued litigation of the case. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on November 18, 2016. (BRP)