Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-1398 - Hackethal v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-1398 - Hackethal v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
February 22, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Harbor Freight Inc.'s Motion to Strike Allegations that it failed to recall or retrofit is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN Part. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's allegations Harbor Freight violated a duty by failing to recall or retrofit the product at issue, specifically 36 (f), shall be stricken from the Plaintiffs petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's allegations Harbor Freight is subject to punitive damages on the basis of a failure to recall or retrofit the product at issue, specifically 83, and 86 shall be DENIED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 2/22/16. (EAB)
June 29, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for extension of time is GRANTED, in part, and Plaintiffs shall have seven days to file a response to Defendants Motion for Protective Order [ECF No. 23]. In the event Plaintiff and Defendant reach an impasse in resolving their dispute on the Motion for Protective Order, the extension shall not be granted beyond July 19th, 2016 without further order of the Court. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 6/29/16. (EAB)
August 23, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for a Protective Order is GRANTED, in part, [ECF No. 23] and the parties shall proceed with 30(b)(6) depositions of corporate representatives. Topics will include, concerning, among other things, corporate structure and chain of command of the QA and PAC-Man departments. The Court does not foreclose Plaintiffs ability to take more depositions, but will withhold consideration of any arguments Plaintiff wishes to make for further discovery until after these initial depositions are completed in October. The Court shall issue an amended case management order after these depositions are completed upon request of the parties. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on August 23, 2016. (MCB)