Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-380 - USA v. Reno et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-380 - USA v. Reno et al
May 9, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to Douglas Druger : IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Defendants Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 101) be DENIED. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Defendants Motion to Suppress Electronic Surveillance Evidence (Doc. 91) be DENIED. The parties are advised that they have fourteen (14) days in which to file written objections to this report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง636(b)(1), unless an extension of time for good cause is obtained, and that failure to file timely objections may result in a waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. See Thompson v. Nix, 897 F.2d 356 (8th Cir. 1990).Trial in this case has been set before the Honorable Catherine D. Perry on June 26, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. Objections to R&R due by 5/23/2017 Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 5/9/17. (LGK)
June 1, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Reports and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 137 is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Douglas Druger's Motion to Suppress Evidence 101 and Defendant Douglas Druger's Motion to Suppress Electronic Surveillance Evidence 91 are DENIED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 6/1/2017. (CBL)