Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-254 - Furlow v. Belmar et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-254 - Furlow v. Belmar et al
April 11, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to inspect the video recording(s) of S.T.s forensic interview [Doc. #34] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this order, The Child Center, Inc. shall provide a copy of the DVD of the November 26, 2014, forensic interview of S.T., in addition to other investigative records regarding the allegations of sexual misconduct by plaintiff Ralph Torres. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to protect the privacy of all reporters, all names and personal identifying information in the records or reports shall be redacted in advance of disclosure to plaintiffs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the DVD and all other records provided by the Child Center, Inc. shall be limited to use in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the viewing or use of the DVD and all other records provided by the Child Center, Inc. shall be restricted to counsel for the parties and plaintiff Ralph Torres. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the copying, reproduction, or distribution of the DVD or other records provided by The Child Center is prohibited. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon the final disposition of this case, the recording and all other records be returned to The Child Center, Inc., or destroyed with an accompanying certification in accordance with Mo. Rev. Stat. ยง 510.035. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for a hearing [Doc. #42] is moot. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 4/11/17. (JAB)
August 11, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Responses to Requests Directed at Third-Party REJIS and to Reopen Deposition 56 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part in accordance with the rulings herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if non-party REJIS has any legal objections to Plaintiffs' email document requests, those objections shall be asserted no later than Wednesday, August 16, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if non-party REJIS has any other documents responsive to the original subpoena not heretofore produced, then REJIS shall produce then within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion to reopen the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of non-party REJIS is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 8/11/17. (KKS)