Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-639 - Norwood-Redfield Apartments Limited Partnership v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-639 - Norwood-Redfield Apartments Limited Partnership v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
May 11, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : 31 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to strike [Doc. #31] is denied.. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 5/11/17. (KKS)
May 18, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. #26] is granted. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 5/18/17. (JAB)
November 22, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to strike is DENIED. ECF No. 50. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs response to Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment shall be due within 14 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 11/22/2017. (NEB)
February 6, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant American Family Mutual Insurance Company's Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. ECF No. 47. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 2/6/18. (NEP)
April 3, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Enforce the Case Management Order is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set forth above. ECF No. 69. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Determine Its Response to Request for Admissions Timely or, in the Alternative, for an Extension of Time is GRANTED as set forth above. ECF No. 76. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on April 3, 2018. (BRP)
June 13, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : Upon review of the record and following the final pretrial conference in this case held on the record on June 13, 2018, and for the reasons stated more fully on the open record, the Court sets forth its rulings on the parties motions in limine, as follows: 1. Defendants Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony Offered by Plaintiff (ECF 70): GRANTED in part, to the extent that Plaintiff will be precluded from offering opinion testimony by Joseph Caulfield based on Plaintiffs failure to properly and timely disclose such opinions, and for the further reasons stated on the record; and DENIED as moot in part as to Herbert Baumann, based on Plaintiffs representation on the record that it does not intend to offer opinion testimony by Mr. Baumann. [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS]. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 06/13/2018. (KCB)
June 20, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine to Bar Attorneys' Fees Testimony Offered by Plaintiff is DENIED in part without prejudice to reassertion after Plaintiff's evidence on this issue is admitted; however, RULING IS RESERVED as to any opinion testimony offered by Plaintiff on the issue of attorneys' fees, pending Plaintiff's demonstration, prior to trial, that such testimony was sufficiently disclosed during discovery. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on June 20, 2018. (BRP)