Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1878 - Boyd v. USA


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1878 - Boyd v. USA
December 6, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 12/06/16. (EAB)
January 5, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This matter is before the Court on movant's motion to supplement his motion to vacate. The motion is denied because this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion to supplement [ECF No. 7] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 1/5/2017. (CBL)
January 18, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This case was properly closed for lack of jurisdiction because movant filed it before he received permission to file a successive motion. Because he how has permission, the proper procedure was to open a new case. Movant is not prejudiced by the procedure. He should not file any more documents in this case. Rather, he should file any future documents in Boyd v. United States, No. 4:16-CV-2148 ERW, which the Court is currently reviewing. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion for clarification is GRANTED. [Doc. No. 9] Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 1/18/2017. (CBL)