Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1886 - Gray v. Las Animas Transfer Inc. et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1886 - Gray v. Las Animas Transfer Inc. et al
March 14, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than noon on Friday, March 17, 2017, Plaintiff shall file and serve on Defendants Las Animas Transfer Inc. and Madill, as well as any other Defendant entering an appearance before then, a memorandum in support of his motion to dismiss without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than noon on Tuesday, March 21, 2017, Defendants Las Animas Transfer Inc. and Madill, and any other Defendant entering an appearance by that time, shall file any response they have to Plaintiff's motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no reply brief in support of Plaintiffs motion to dismiss shall be filed except upon further order of Court for good cause shown. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for the parties' joint scheduling plan is extended from March 22, 2017, to March 27, 2017. The Rule 16 conference remains scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 29, 2017. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that, on or before March 27, 2017, Plaintiff shall file his response to the February 17, 2017 show cause order with regard to service of process on Defendants CRST Expedited Inc. and Medina. Plaintiff's failure timely to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff's claims, with each party bearing its own costs. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The failure of any Defendant who has entered an appearance timely to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal with prejudice of any counterclaim or cross-claim the Defendant filed. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and 41(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 3/14/2017. (CBL)
March 22, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than noon on March 24, 2017: (1) Plaintiff and each Defendant before the Court at that time (other than Defendants CRST Expedited Inc. and Medina) shall file and serve on the other parties before the Court a response to the motion to remand; and (2) Defendants CRST Expedited Inc. and Medina shall file and serve on the other parties before the Court a response to Plaintiff's motion to dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if necessary, no later than 5:00 p.m. on March 28, 2017, Plaintiff may file a reply supporting his motion to dismiss, and Defendants CRST Expedited Inc. and Medina may file a reply supporting their motion to remand. Any reply shall be served promptly on the other parties before the Court at the time the reply is filed. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that, due to the pending motions and the failure to serve Defendant Brown as of this date, both the March 29, 2017, conference and the March 27, 2017, deadline for the parties' filing of a Joint Scheduling Plan are VACATED. A Rule 16 conference and deadline for the filing of the parties' Joint Scheduling Plan will be re-set, if necessary, after resolution of the pending motions to dismiss and to remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on March 22, 2017. (MCB)