Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-1351 - Roeslein & Associates, Inc. et al v. Elgin et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-1351 - Roeslein & Associates, Inc. et al v. Elgin et al
May 19, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Thomas Elgin's Second Motion forExtension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint 21 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 5/19/17. (CAR)
September 28, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Elgin's attorneys shall state, in writing and filed under seal and ex parte no later than October 10, 2017, the specific nature of the "professional considerations that requirethe termination of representation" such as they have been discharged by Elgin, see Rule 4-16(a)(3); believe that their representation of the defendant has been rendered unreasonably difficult as a result of defendant's actions, see Rule 4-16(b)(6); or if other good cause for withdrawal exists. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the attorneys shall also file an affidavit from Elgin wherein Elginavers that he consents to his attorneys withdrawing their representation and that he is aware of the deadlines set forth in the Case Management Order and the pending motions in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 9/28/2017. (CAR)
October 26, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bridget L. Halquist's Motion for In-Person, Ex Parte Hearing on the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (ECF No. 66) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel and Elgin shall appear on Friday, November 3, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 15 South for the ex parte hearing.. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 10/26/17. (LGK)
March 2, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Their Amended Complaint (ECF No. 40) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The motion is GRANTED as to Counts I-II and Counts IV-VI, and the motion is DENIED as to Count III. 2. Plaintiffs' claim for a constructive trust is DISMISSED. 3. Plaintiffs shall file a First Amended Complaint that is consistent with this Memorandum and Order on or before March 19, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that te John M. Bodenhausen on 3/2/18. (ARL)his Court will issue an appropriate order of Partial Dismissal in accordance with this Memorandum and Order after Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Elgin's Motion to Dismiss and for More Definite Statement (ECF No. 29), and Meyer Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF No. 45) are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Request to Take Judicial Notice (ECF No. 71) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judg