Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

94-017 - Tyler, et al v. Carnahan, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
94-017 - Tyler, et al v. Carnahan, et al
February 9, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Tyler's "Petition Under Rule 60(b)(6) and For Clarification," construed as a motion for relief under Rule 60(b)(6), is DENIED. [Doc. 263]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 2/9/2016. (MRC)
March 18, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Tylers Motion Under Rule 59(e) and/or Independent Action Rule 60(b)(d)(1) [sic] Requesting Clarification is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction as to Rule 59(e), and DENIED as to Rule 60(d)(1). [Doc. 265]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/18/2016. (MRC)