Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

05-437 - WILLIAMSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
05-437 - WILLIAMSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
September 21, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by Judge N. C. TILLEY JR. on 9/21/05, that Petitioner's "motion for appropriate relief"pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(b) and (c) [Pleading No. 1] be DENIED, thatPetitioner's motion be construed as a motion to vacate, set aside or correctsentence, and that the motion to vacate be dismissed without prejudice for failure to obtain certification for this 2255 application by filing a Motion forAuthorization in the court of appeals as required by 28 U.S.C. 2255 and 2244 and Fourth Circuit Local Rule 22(d). A judgment dismissing this action will beentered contemporaneously with this Order. (1:00CR288-1)(Welch, Kelly)
June 4, 2008
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE P. TREVOR SHARP on 6/4/2008, that the Clerk send Petitioner a copy of this Recommendation, instruction forms for filing § 2255 actions in this Court and Motions for Authorization in the court of appeals, and four copies of § 2255 forms (more copies will be sent on request). Petitioner should keep the original and two copies of the completed § 2255 forms which can be submitted in this Court if Petitioner obtains approval from the Fourth Circuit. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion (Doc. #10) be construed as an attempt by Petitioner to file a second or successive § 2255 action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed due to Petitioner's failure to obtain certification from the Fourth Circuit as required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244 and 2255 and Fourth Circuit Local Rule 22(d). (1:00CR288-1) (Lloyd, Donna)
July 29, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR., on 7/29/2008, that Petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion [Docket No. 10] be construed as an attempt by Petitioner to file a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence, and that the motion to vacate be dismissed without prejudice due to Petitioner's failure to obtain certification from the Fourth Circuit as required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244 and 2255 and Fourth Circuit Local Rule 22(d). A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (1:00CR288-1) (Lloyd, Donna)