Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

06-607 - EDWARDS v. CITY OF HIGH POINT


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
06-607 - EDWARDS v. CITY OF HIGH POINT
March 26, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE P. TREVOR SHARP on 3/25/2008, that Plaintiff's non-dispositive motions (Pleading Nos. 69, 70, and 82) are DENIED, and Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend a brief he had previously filed (Pleading No. 47) is GRANTED. Further, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the summary judgment motions of Plaintiff (Pleading No. 19 and 75) be denied, that the summary judgment motions of Defendants (Pleading Nos. 64 and 66) be granted and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Lloyd, Donna) Modified on 3/27/2008 to edit text as to deleting objections deadline. (Lloyd, Donna) Modified on 3/27/2008 to add additional text. (Lloyd, Donna)
June 3, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR., on 6/3/2008, adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc No. 84); that Plaintiff's summary judgment motions (Docket Nos. 19 and 75) be DENIED, that Defendants' summary judgment motions (Docket Nos. 64 and 66) be GRANTED, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. FURTHER, that Plaintiff's motion to obtain a copy of the videotape (Docket No. 87) is DENIED for lack of good cause. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Lloyd, Donna)