Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-725 - ALEXANDER v. DIVERSIFIED ACE SERVICES II, AJV, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-725 - ALEXANDER v. DIVERSIFIED ACE SERVICES II, AJV, et al
February 7, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR. on 2/7/2014, that Corporate Defendants and Defendant Godwin's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #33) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, as to Corporate Defendants, the Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claim of negligent hiring and as to Plaintiff's claim that Corporate Defendants are directly liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress. However, as to Corporate Defendants, the Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's Title VII harassment claim and as to Plaintiff's claims that Corporate Defendants are vicariously liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress, assault, and battery. FURTHER, as to Defendant Godwin, that the Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #33) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claim of Title VII harassment claim and as to Plaintiff's claim of conspiracy to interfere with civil rights. Finally, Defendant Malone's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #32) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, as to Defendant Malone, his Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claim of conspiracy to interfere with civil rights and Plaintiff's claim that Defendant Malone is directly liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress. However, as to Defendant Malone, and for the reasons stated herein his Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's Title VII harassment claim, as to Plaintiff's claim of wrongful discharge, Plaintiff's claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress, and Plaintiff's claim that Defendant Malone is vicariously liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress. (Daniel, J)