Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-1204 - BROWN et al v. PENN NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-1204 - BROWN et al v. PENN NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
January 28, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER signed on 1/28/2014. For the foregoing reasons, this Court finds that there is genuine issue of material fact as to whether Defendant has a duty and obligation under NCFRA to provide benefits and coverage for any injuries sustained by Plaintiff on 6/3/2012. The Court finds that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to whether coverage exists pursuant to Policy terms because Mrs. Ferguson was not an "insured" as defined by the Policy. Accordingly, the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 19) be GRANTED IN PART as to coverage under the Policy, and DENIED IN PART as to claims under the NCFRA. (Daniel, J)
March 17, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM ORDER. Signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 3/17/2014, that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ADOPTED as modified herein, and that Penn National's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 19) is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' claim for coverage under the Policy but is DENIED as to coverage under the Act. (Daniel, J)