Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-497 - ROTHROCK v. COLVIN


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-497 - ROTHROCK v. COLVIN
March 23, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 03/23/2016. Plaintiff has established grounds warranting remand for further administrative proceedings. RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be vacated, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 11) be granted in part (i.e., to the extent it requests remand), that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 15) be denied, and that this matter be remanded for further administrative proceedings as to (1) whether Plaintiff meets Listing 12.05C, (2) whether (and, if so, why) Plaintiff's inability to interact with supervisors for more than one-third of a work day would cause little, if any, reduction in the sedentary job base, (3) why, for purposes of assessing an RFC, restricting Plaintiff to SRRTs adequately accounts for his moderate limitation in CPP (or, alternatively, whether additional restrictions should apply), (4) whether a function-by-function analysis of Plaintiff's mental impairment supports adoption of any other RFC restrictions, and (5) whether any restrictions included in Plaintiffs RFC (as assessed on remand) preclude reliance on the Grids at step five. (Taylor, Abby)