Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-274 - SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC v. WILLOWOOD, LLC et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-274 - SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC v. WILLOWOOD, LLC et al
October 14, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 10/14/2015. Syngenta has not established that Willowood Limited has the minimum contacts with North Carolina necessary for this Court to exercise personal jurisdiction. However, Syngenta has shown that personal jurisdiction is appropriate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k)(2). The motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) is DENIED. (Daniel, J)
March 24, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 3/24/2017, that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 93) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 87) is DENIED in part and is otherwise retained under advisement as set out herein. FURTHER, that the plaintiff's motion to exclude certain expert opinions (Doc. 90) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and DEFERRED in part and is otherwise retained under advisement as set out herein.(Daniel, J)
May 4, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 5/4/2017, that the pending motions to seal are granted in part, denied in part, and deferred in part as follows: (1) The Motion to Seal at (Doc. 89) is DENIED. (2) The Motion to Seal at (Doc. 91) is GRANTED as to (Docs. 99-3, 99-11 to 99-16, 99-21, and 99-22) and these documents are to remained sealed; DENIED as to (Docs. 98, 99-1, 99-2, 99-5, 99-6, 99-8, 99-10, 99-17, 99-18, and 99-19); DEFERRED as to (Docs. 99-4, 99-7, 99-9, and 99-20) and these documents are to remained sealed. (3) The Motion to Seal at (Doc 104) is DENIED. (4) The Motion to Seal at (Doc. 111) is DENIED as to (Doc. 114-1); DENIED as to Willowood's information and DEFERRED as to Syngenta's information in (Doc. 113) and this document is to remain sealed; DEFERRED as to (Doc. 114-2) and this document is to remain sealed. (5) The Motion to Seal at (Doc. 117) is DENIED as to (Doc. 117-1 and Doc. 117-2). (6)Syngenta is allowed seven days to submit affidavits in support of sealing (Docs. 99-20, 114-2 and 113) as set forth in this Order. Willowood is allowed seven days to submit affidavits in support of sealing (Docs. 99-4, 99-7, and 99-9) as set forth in this Order. (7) As to other pending motions to seal not addressed by this Order, (Docs. 146, 149, 153), the litigants may file supplemental affidavits in the next seven days without seeking leave of court. (Daniel, J)
July 20, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 7/20/2017, that the Willowood's motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Benjamin Wilner, (Doc. 147), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part for the reasons stated herein. (Daniel, J)
August 2, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 8/2/2017, that 1. Syngentas Motions in Limine Numbers 8 and 11, (Doc. 213), and its Motion in Limine Number 13, (Doc. 242), are GRANTED in part and Willowood is precluded from (a) Offering the testimony of Matt Heinze, Rajesh Jain, Sophia Wang, Ann Tillman, Cathy Zhu, Fei Wang, Felix Chen, Vince Miata, Chen Ming, Chiu Zhenghong, or Mr. Li. (b) Offering new documents from third-parties or from Tai He. 2. Because Syngenta withdrew its motion in limine as to Andy King, as to him the motion is DENIED and Willowood may offer his evidence at trial. (Daniel, J)
December 4, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 12/4/2017. 1. Syngenta's motion to seal, (Doc. 330), is granted in part and denied in part as follows: a. The motion to seal is GRANTED as to DTX 35 and 252, and PTX 6.b-d, 110.a, 123.a, 140.a, and 148.a. The Clerk shall maintain these documents under seal. b. The motion to seal is GRANTED as to DTX 68, 82, 86, 88, 92, 94, 99, 107, 108, 128, 160 and 211 and PTX 225.a. The Clerk shall maintain these documents under seal and include in the public record the redacted version of these documents as provided in Exhibit E of (Doc. 333). c. The motion to seal is DENIED as to PTX 259, 276, and 277. The Clerk need not maintain these exhibits under seal. d. The motion to seal is GRANTED as to the following trial testimony: 9/12/17 Tr. at 138-40. The Clerk shall maintain these lines from the trial transcript under seal and shall only make publicly available the redacted versions of these transcripts as provided in Exhibit I of (Doc. 333). e. The motion to seal is DENIED as to the following trial testimony: 9/6/17 Tr. at 167-175; 9/7/17 Tr. at 41, 133-35, 146-52 and 199; 9/8/17 Tr. at 70-76, 131-132, and 155; 9/12/17 Tr. at 33. The transcripts need not be filed under seal. 2. Syngentas motion to seal, (Doc. 287), is DENIED as moot.(Daniel, J)