Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-596 - LINDSAY v. GLICK et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-596 - LINDSAY v. GLICK et al
April 22, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 04/22/2016; that Plaintiff's Motion (Docket Entry 32) be GRANTED. Additionally, the Court finds that, unless justice requires otherwise, no amended or supplemental pleadings will be allowed going forward. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion entitled "Motion for Access to Photocopying and Notary Services" (Docket Entry 26) and Plaintiff's motion entitled "Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Appointment of Counsel (D.E. 3) and Memorandum of Law in Support" (Docket Entry 50) are DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions (Docket Entries 33, 45, 46) be DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Docket Entry 53) is GRANTED. Defendants shall have up to and including May 18, 2016, to respond to Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories and Request for Admissions and Second Request for Production of Documents. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoena (Docket Entry 48) by May 18, 2016. (Garland, Leah)
May 26, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 05/26/2016; that Plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment (Docket Entries 54, 60) be DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling a summary judgment motion at the close of discovery. (Garland, Leah)
June 22, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 06/22/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation; that Plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment (ECF Nos. 54, 60) be DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling a summary judgment motion at the close of discovery. (Garland, Leah)
October 25, 2016
PDF | More
duce documents specified in camera inspection to Plaintiff within 14 days of this order. Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Extending Limitations of Length of Brief in Opposition to Dispositive Motions (D.E.94), and Plaintiff's Motion for Court to Intervene (D.E.97) are DENIED as moot. Defendants respond to Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for a TRO and Preliminary injunction (D.E. 98). Defendants will have 14 days to respond of this order. (Daniel, J)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 10/25/2016, Plaintiff's Motion to Enter Plaintiff's Rebuttal Evidence into Court Records (D.E. 58), Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (D.E.68), Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsider Motion to Amend Complaint (D.E. 72), Plaintiff's Motion for Production of Documents and Things and Entry Upon Land for Inspection and Other Purposes to William Glick, III (D.E.75), Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (D.E. 78), Plaintiff's Motion for Emergency no Contact Order by Defendants Locklear and Bond (D.E.99), and Defendants' Motion to Deem Response Timely Filed (D.E.103) are DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Extending Limitations of Length of Brief to Refile Partial Summary Judgments (D.E.81) is DENIED. Plaintiff will be allowed to file a supplement to his current motion for partial summary judgment (D.E. 89), to make any other arguments, limited to 10 pages. Plaintiff will have 21 days to file this supplement and Defendant will have 21 days to file a response. Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoena (D.E.48)is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. Defendants shall pro
March 16, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 03/16/2017, that Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 98) is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 117) is GRANTED, Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 89) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. (Garland, Leah)