Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-947 - TURNER v. CLELLAND et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-947 - TURNER v. CLELLAND et al
March 16, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 03/16/2016. Plaintiff failed to comply with the procedural prerequisites for obtaining a TRO and to establish entitlement to preliminary injunctive relief. RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Request for Temporary Injunction (Docket Entry 4) be DENIED.(Taylor, Abby)
June 22, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 06/22/2016, that the court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, and that Plaintiff's Request for Temporary Injunction (Doc. 4) is DENIED. (Taylor, Abby)
November 30, 2016
PDF | More
ry-related relief to which he can show entitlement. RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Dismissal Motion (Docket Entry 32) be granted in part and denied in part, in that the existence of a material factual dispute regarding exhaustion precludes summary judgment in Defendants' favor on that issue; Plaintiff's requests for injunctive relief and thus his RLUIPA claim(s) fail(s) on grounds of mootness; Plaintiff's official capacity damages claims fail as a matter of law; and Defendant Curry enjoys qualified immunity.(Taylor, Abby)MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 11/30/2016, that Plaintiff's Discovery Motion is DENIED as MOOT, but without prejudice to his right to seek any other discove
March 7, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 03/07/2017, that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 32) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART: The existence of a material factual dispute regarding exhaustion precludes summary judgment in Defendants' favor on that issue; Plaintiff's requests for injunctive relief and thus his claims under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000cc et seq., fail on grounds of mootness; Plaintiff's official capacity damages claims fail as a matter of law; and Defendant "C/O Mr. Curry" enjoys qualified immunity. (Taylor, Abby)