Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-1016 - RAZZAK v. ACKOYT et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-1016 - RAZZAK v. ACKOYT et al
December 22, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 12/22/2015; that in forma pauperis status be granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket Entry 3) is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order Plaintiff make an initial filing fee payment of $6.67. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's trust officer shall be directed to pay to the Clerk of this Court 20% of all deposits to his account starting with the month of February of 2016, and thereafter each time that the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $400.00 filing fee has been paid. If an inmate has been ordered to make Prison Litigation Reform Act payments in more than one action or appeal in the federal courts, the total amount collected for all cases cannot exceed 20 percent of the inmate's preceding monthly income or trust account balance, as calculated under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for being frivolous or malicious or for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Garland, Leah)
January 7, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 01/07/2016; that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation and that the Court's prior order regarding Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status and the payment of the filing fee in this case remain in place. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Docket Entry 7) is granted and that the Amended Complaint is accepted for filing. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Amended Complaint be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for being frivolous or malicious, failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and for seeking monetary damages from a party immune from such damages. (Garland, Leah)
February 22, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 02/22/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendations, that this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for being frivolous or malicious, failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and for seeking monetary damages from a party immune from such damages. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Garland, Leah)
April 15, 2016
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 04/15/2016; that Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Docket Entry 18) be denied. (Garland, Leah)
May 3, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 05/03/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, that Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (ECF No. 18) is denied. (Garland, Leah)