Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1368 - BRYANT et al v. WOODALL et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1368 - BRYANT et al v. WOODALL et al
April 7, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 4/7/2017, that Defendants' Rule 56(d) Motion (Docket Entry 21) is GRANTED. Defendants may conduct discovery until June 6, 2017, regarding: (1) whether any fetuses between 20 and 26 weeks in North Carolina meet the definition of "viable" adopted by the Supreme Court, and, if so, how many and when; (2) whether fetuses between 20 and 26 weeks experience pain and, if so, when and to what degree; (3) whether abortions of fetuses between 20 and 26 weeks pose any greater health risks to pregnant women than abortions of fetuses before 20 weeks and, if so, when and to what degree; and (4) Plaintiffs' standing to bring this action. Defendants shall file any response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 13) by July 6, 2017. (Daniel, J)
August 24, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATIONOF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 08/24/2018, that the Strike Motion (Docket Entry 69) is DENIED without prejudice to the filing, on or before September 4, 2018, of a motion that appropriately addresses the identified defects in the Strike Motion; FURTHER that the Clerk shall refer any such motion to the undersigned or, in the absence of such motion, the Clerk shall remove the access restrictions on the attachments to Docket Entry 53 (i.e., Docket Entries 53-1 through 53-5); RECOMMENDED that the Court deny the Summary Judgment Motion (Docket Entry 44) and dismiss this action for want ofsubject-matter jurisdiction due to Plaintiffs' lack of standing.(Taylor, Abby)