Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

07-3063 - Fair v. Houston


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
07-3063 - Fair v. Houston
March 6, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER ON INITIAL REVIEW granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. That filing no. 2, the petitioner's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, is granted. That the Clerk of Court shall mail copies of the 2254 petition to the respondent and to the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail; and within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, the respondent shall file an Answer to the 2254 petition on the merits of the claims. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett. (Copies mailed as directed.)(JAR)
July 3, 2007
PDF | More
GENERAL ORDER 2007-09 concerning the management of pro se cases including supervision of pro se staff attorneys. Except for motions filed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 and except for death penalty cases, Judge Kopf is assigned the overall responsibility for the management of pro se cases in the District of Nebraska and all previously filed pro se cases referred to Magistrate Judge Gossett or Magistrate Judge Thalken are herewith reassigned to Magistrate Judge Piester. The clerk's office shall file this order in each pending case referred to the Pro Se Docket in CM/ECF. Ordered by Chief Judge Bataillon. (JAE, )
September 11, 2007
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 24 Motion to Appoint Counsel and setting progression of case. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The following progression order is entered: A. No later than October 15, 2007, the respondent shall file a separate brief on the merits. B. No later than 30 days following the filing of the respondent's brief, the petitioner shall file and serve a brief in response. C. No later than 30 days after the filing of the petitioner's brief, therespondent shall file and serve a reply brief. D. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to petitioner.)(JAB)
December 21, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER granting 27 Respondent's motion to extend time to 2/1/08 to file initial brief on the merits of the habeas corpus petition 27. No later than 30 days following the filing of the respondent's brief, the petitioner shall file and serve a brief in response. The petitioner shall submit no other documents unless directed to do so by the court. No later than 30 days after the filing of the petitioner's brief, the respondent shall file and serve a reply brief. The Clerk of Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline using the following language: "February 1, 2008: respondent's brief on the merits is due."Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(CCB)
February 25, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - 1. Petitioner's Motion for an Order to Comply and Produce (filing no. 32) is denied as moot subject to reassertion if Petitioner does not receive Respondent's "pin point" citation records. 2. Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Brief Date (filing no. 33) is grantedin part and denied in part. Petitioner shall have an extension of time until April 21,2008 to file his brief in response to Respondents brief. No later than 30 days after the filing of the Petitioner's brief, Respondent shall file and serve a reply brief. 3. The Clerk of court is directed to set a case management deadline using the following language: May 21, 2008 Habeas ripe for decision. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
August 18, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding motions. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Respondent's Brief (filing no. 41) is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (filing no. 42) is denied without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKL)
September 8, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the petition for writ of habeas corpus(filing no. 1) is denied with prejudice. A separate judgment will be issued.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKL)