Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

07-3078 - Beetz v. Ambrosi et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
07-3078 - Beetz v. Ambrosi et al
September 5, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER - Upon the oral motion of the parties: The parties' motion for an extension of the deadline for filing the Report of Parties' Planning Conference is granted. Provided the case is not dismissed, the parties shall electronically file their Rule 26 meeting report within ten days after the courts ruling on the defendants' pending motion to dismiss. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester.(GJG, )
November 15, 2007
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the defendants' joint motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to the doctrine of res judicata, filing 19, is granted. In all other respects, the defendants' motion is denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Warren K. Urbom. (CS, )
December 19, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER granting 44 Motion of Defendants for Enlargement of Time. The Motion of Defendants' (sic) for Enlargement of Time, filing 44, is granted by extending until December 17, 2007, the time within which the defendants may respond to the Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. Such response was made on December 17 and, accordingly, is timely. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)
April 8, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 41 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. The plaintiff presents a number of additional arguments in his motion and brief. (See generally filings 41 and 42.) I have reviewed these arguments, and I am left unpersuaded that reconsideration of my memorandum and order of November 15, 2007, is warranted. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)