Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

07-3106 - Brown v. Houston


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
07-3106 - Brown v. Houston
May 16, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: That Robert Houston is substituted as the respondent in this case; the Clerk of Court shall modify the courts records accordingly;That filing no. 2, the petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed In FormaPauperis, is granted; That the Clerk of Court shall mail copies of the § 2254 petition to the respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail; That, by June 29, 2007, the respondent shall file an Answer to the § 2254 petition on the merits of the claims and any affirmative defenses, in the manner contemplated by Rule 5 of the 2254 Rules, or the respondent may, in his discretion, limit his response to affirmative defense(s) by filing a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(b); 5. That, whether the respondent files an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the respondent shall also file with the court and serve on the petitioner a pleading entitled Designation of Relevant State Court Records; That all records listed in the respondents Designation of Relevant State Court Records shall be filed with, or delivered to, the court at the time the Designation of Relevant State Court Records is filed; That if the respondent elects to file a motion for summary judgment, copies of all records designated and filed in support of the motion shall also be served on thepetitioner; and That, whether the respondent files an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the petitioner may reply within 30 days thereafter.Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon.(PCV, )
July 3, 2007
PDF | More
GENERAL ORDER 2007-09 concerning the management of pro se cases including supervision of pro se staff attorneys. Except for motions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and except for death penalty cases, Judge Kopf is assigned the overall responsibility for the management of pro se cases in the District of Nebraska and all previously filed pro se cases referred to Magistrate Judge Gossett or Magistrate Judge Thalken are herewith reassigned to Magistrate Judge Piester. The clerk's office shall file this order in each pending case referred to the Pro Se Docket in CM/ECF. Ordered by Chief Judge Bataillon. (JAE, )
September 18, 2007
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of this order in which to file a response to Respondent's motion for summary judgment. In the absence of a response to Respondent's motion for summary judgment, the court will rule on Respondent's motion without further notice. In the event that Petitioner files a response, no later than 30 days after the filing of Petitioner's response, Respondent may file and serve a reply brief. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline with the following text: October 18, 2007: check for the filing of petitioner's response.Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
January 16, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding MOTION for Summary Judgment6 that the Petitioner Yosha Venitia Browns petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied in all respects and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this memorandum and order.Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)