Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

08-3018 - Kurtzhals v. Grell et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
08-3018 - Kurtzhals v. Grell et al
February 7, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER granting 3 Motion for Refund of Filing Fees Paid Electronically. The court finds that the payor inadvertently paid the filing fee twice in the same case, resulting in two identical credit card charges. Therefore, it is ordered that pursuant to General Order 2006-08 the filing fee in the amount of $ 350.00, receipt number 08670000000001115470, be refunded to the payor. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)
April 2, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding: Notice (Other)13 filed by defendants Lincoln, City of, Chad Hein, Alan Grell. The defendants' notice of removal, (filing 13), did not remove Lancaster County District Court Case No. CI 07-3267 to this forum. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the Clerk of the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (Copy mailed to Lancaster County District Court)(JAB)
April 16, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER granting 17 Motion to Amend Order Setting Schedule. The telephonic planning conference will be held on June 11, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel for the plaintiff shall place the call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKL)
June 13, 2008
PDF | More
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge - upon consent of parties, this case is transferred to Magistrate Judge David L. Piester for final disposition. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKL)
July 9, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER - Plaintiff's counsel experienced technological difficulties in filing his brief opposing the defendants' motion for summary judgment, (filing 21), and in favor of his motion for partial summary judgment, (filing 24). The plaintiff's brief was ultimately filed on July 8, 2008. To facilitate an orderly progression for fair resolution of these motions on the merits, The defendants are given until July 31, 2008 to file their response to the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and their reply to the plaintiff's brief opposing defendants motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff may file a reply to the defendants' brief opposing the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment within five business days after the defendants' brief is filed. Absent a court-ordered extension of the deadlines set forth herein, the parties' motions for summary judgment will be deemed fully submitted seven business days following the conclusion of the briefing schedule set forth in this order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (GJG, )