Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

08-3207 - Information Technology, Inc. v. BankEast


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
08-3207 - Information Technology, Inc. v. BankEast
January 7, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER regarding MOTION to Extend Rule 26(f) Report Filing Deadline22 filed by Information Technology, Inc. On or before January 12, 2009, the defendant shall file its response to the plaintiff's motion to extend the deadline for filing the parties' Rule 26(f) report, (filing no. 22), in the absence of which the motion will be deemed unopposed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)
January 9, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER regarding 22 Motion to Extend. THIS matter comes on for hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Rule 26(f) Report Filing Deadline, filing no. 22. The Court being fully advised in the premises grants said Motion and extends the Rule 26(f) Report Filing deadline to fourteen (14) days following the Courts ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)
February 3, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER - This matter is before the court on Defendant BankEast's motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, stay in light of a Tennessee state court action (filing 11). This court will defer ruling on BankEast's motion to dismiss or stay until the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee rules on BankEast's motion to remand in Case No. 3:08-cv-476, or until further order of this court. Within thirty (30) days of this order, counsel for ITI and counsel for BankEast shall jointly file with this court an affidavit averring as to compliance with paragraph 3 of this order. ***Set/Reset All Deadlines: ( Case Management Deadline set for 3/5/2009.)Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
September 3, 2009
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The parties shall have until October 5, 2009, to advise the court, by brief if necessary, whether the court should, or needs to, rule on BankEast's motion to remand. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
October 7, 2009
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - BankEast's motion to dismiss or stay (filing 11) is denied as moot. Parties shall have until November 9, 2009, to show cause as to why this action should not be consolidated with BankEast v. Information Technology, Inc., Case No. 8:09-cv-0259 (D. Neb. 2009) or, alternatively, to consent to consolidation. A separate order shall be issued in BankEast v. Information Technology, Inc., Case No. 8:09-cv-0259 (D. Neb. 2009) noting that the motion to remand pending in that case has been withdrawn by BankEast (filing 34). Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)
January 25, 2010
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The court has been advised that the parties in the above-captioned matter have reached a settlement of their claims. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of this order, the parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal. This case is removed from the court's trial docket upon representation by the parties that the case has settled. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)