Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-3079 - Cronin et al v. Peterson et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-3079 - Cronin et al v. Peterson et al
September 20, 2017
PDF | More
e to State a Claim (Filing No. 13) is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLF)ORDER - The plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Filing No. 15) is granted, and the plaintiffs shall file their Amended Complaint within 10 days of the date of this order. The defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failur
January 24, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Filing No. 20) is granted in part and denied in part. The claims and Defendants remaining in this suit are as follows: a. Plaintiff Cronin's Unlawful Arrest Claim against Defendant Koepke in his individual capacity; b. Plaintiff Cronin's Invalid Search Warrant Claim against Defendants Peterson and Peters in their individual capacities; and c. Plaintiff Cronin's Unlawful Execution of Search Warrant Claim against Defendants Koepke and Reynolds in their individual capacities as to the search of Cronin's home, person, and vehicle. The following Defendants shall be dismissed from this case: Defendant Chris Peterson in his official capacity; Defendant James Peschong in his individual and official capacities; Defendant Brian Jackson in his individual and official capacities; Defendant Tonya Peters in her official capacity; Defendant William Koepke in his official capacity; Defendant Daren Reynolds in his official capacity; and Defendant City of Lincoln. The court's resolution of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss resolves all of Plaintiff Fullerton's claims in favor of Defendants. If either party wishes the court to enter judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), such party shall file a motion and supporting brief discussing why the court should, or should not, enter judgment under Rule 54(b). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLF)
May 1, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically stored information ("ESI") or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party's right to conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF)
May 1, 2018
PDF | More
PROTECTIVE ORDER - granting Joint Stipulation for Protective Order 36. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF)