Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-3085 - Russell v. Anderson


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-3085 - Russell v. Anderson
January 10, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - Christopher Gruber's Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff (Filing No. 24) is granted. Mr. Gruber shall immediately serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff and thereafter file proof of service showing compliance with this Order, listing the name and address of the person to whom notice was sent. Mr. Gruber will not be relieved of applicable duties to the Court, Plaintiff, and opposing counsel until proof of service is filed. Upon filing of proof of service pursuant to Paragraph 2 of this Order, Plaintiff will be deemed to be proceeding pro se, that is, without the assistance of counsel, unless substitute counsel has entered a written appearance on his behalf. If substitute counsel has not entered a written appearance, Plaintiff shall provide the Clerk of Court his current address and telephone number within five days of being served with this Order. Plaintiff may retain substitute counsel at any time. However, until such time as substitute counsel enters a written appearance, Plaintiff must comply with all case progression deadlines, orders of this Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the imposition of sanctions, including payment of costs, attorneys' fees, the entry of default judgment, and/or dismissal of the case. Upon Mr. Gruber's submission of proof of service as described in Paragraph 2 of this Order, Mr. Gruber's appearance as counsel of record for Plaintiff will be terminated. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF)
May 8, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - Plaintiff shall disclose all medical providers not previously disclosed within five (5) days of this Order. Plaintiff shall provide a certification that the list is full and complete to the best of Plaintiffs knowledge and belief. Plaintiff shall provide Defendants counsel with the bates numbers of previously produced medical records. Plaintiff shall do so within five (5) days of this Order. Plaintiff shall review his social media accounts and determine what social media information is available for production. Plaintiff shall complete this review within fourteen (14) days of this Order, and confer with Defendants counsel regarding production of this information. Plaintiff shall produce the lien information as requested. The parties indicated that the other issues presented to the Court could be resolved by the parties. Therefore, the parties shall meet and confer to resolve the remaining discovery issues. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
July 31, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - Defendant's First Motion for Sanctions (Filing No. 56) is denied. Defendant's Motion to Compel (Filing No. 70) is granted as set forth above. The pretrial conference and trial are hereby continued. A telephonic status conference will be held on October 5, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. to reschedule the pretrial conference and trial. Telephone conference instructions are found at Filing No. 12. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
August 1, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant's request that the court delay its decision on Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. 31) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. 31) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: a. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to the admitted fact that the Defendant was negligent in crossing the center line on or about August 9, 2013, when Defendant was driving his automobile northbound on Highway 281 in Greeley County, Nebraska, while Plaintiff was driving his motorcycle southbound; andb. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to the issues ofwhether Plaintiff failed to mitigate his damages and whether Plaintiffwas negligent in contributing to cause the collision. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKO)