Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-3155 - Wilson v. Frakes


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-3155 - Wilson v. Frakes
December 1, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's request to proceed IFP (Filing No. 2) is denied. Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee within 30 days. Petitioner is warned that if the fee is not paid as required, the court may dismiss this case without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 2, 2018: deadline for Petitioner to pay $5.00 filing fee. No further review of this case will take place until the filing fee is paid. Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Filing No. 4) is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party; e-mailed to Finance) (KLF)
March 29, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the habeas corpus petition (Filing No. 1), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims, as they are set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal court. By May 14, 2018, Respondents must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: May 14, 2018: deadline for Respondents to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: June 12, 2018: check for Respondents' answer and separate brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
June 6, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that Petitioner's Objection to State Court Records in Support of Answer (filing no. 12), Motion to Expand the Record (filing no. 13), and Motion to Produce One True Copy (filing no. 14) are denied without prejudice to reassertion. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
September 25, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's "Motion to Stay" (filing no. 21), which the court construes as a motion for extension of time, is granted. Petitioner shall have until December 26, 2018, to file a brief in response to Respondent's Answer and Brief in Support. Petitioner's Motion to Expand the Record (filing no. 22) is denied. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 26, 2018: check for Petitioner's brief in response. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)