Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-3157 - Pigee v. Frakes


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-3157 - Pigee v. Frakes
November 29, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER that the Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
November 30, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER that upon initial review of the Petition (Filing No. 1), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims are potentially cognizable in federal court. By January 16, 2018, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 16, 2018: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. initial review of the Petition (Filing No. 1), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioners claims are potentially cognizable in federal court. By January 16, 2018, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 16, 2018: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondent elects to file an answer, the following procedures must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Filing No. 5) is denied without prejudice to reassertion.Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
January 17, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER that Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (filing no. 10) is denied without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
April 2, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - that the undersigned's order dated January 17, 2018, is revised as follows: Petitioner's responsive brief to Respondent's Answer shall befiled on or before April 23, 2018. Respondent's reply brief shall be filed on or before May 23, 2018. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
April 3, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - that Petitioner's Motion for Extension to File Response (filing no. 19) is granted. Petitioner's responsive brief to Respondent's Answer shallbe filed on or before April 30, 2018. Respondent's reply brief shall be filed on or before May 30, 2018. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
May 8, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that the habeas corpus petition (filing no. 1) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. No certificate of appealability has been or will be issued. Judgment will be issued by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)