Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

04-353 - Ullico v. Planners&Insurers et al

Download Files


Document in Context
04-353 - Ullico v. Planners&Insurers et al
April 26, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER granting plaintiff's unopposed 35 Motion to Extend Time. Jury trial is continued to 9:00 a.m., September 26, 2005 for a duration of five days before the Honorable Richard G. Kopf in the Special Proceedings Courtroom, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, Omaha, Nebraska. Trial is subject to the prior disposition or continuance of any criminal matters which may be set for that week as well as Doe v. Thermal Services, 8:04cv357; New Hope v. City of Omaha, 8:04cv259; King v. West Corporation, 8:04cv318; Chao v. Patrinos, 8:04cv388; and Becella v. Kellogg, 8:04cv380. Jury selection will be held atcommencement of trial. The pretrial conference will be held August 17, 2005 at10:00 a.m. before the undersigned magistrate judge in the chambers of the undersigned, 566 Federal Building and United States Courthouse, Lincoln, Nebraska. The deposition deadline is continued to August 3, 2005 and other deadlines which use the deposition deadline as a point of reference are extended accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester on 4/26/2005. (CS, )
June 13, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER denying 37 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff has not shown good cause and there remains sufficient time to prepare for a late September trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester on 6/13/2005. (JAR)
July 6, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER granting 41 Motion to Stay. This matter is STAYED until further order of this court, granting an application made by either party to lift the stay and resume these proceedings. Signed by magistrate Judge David L. Piester on 7/6/2005. (JAR)
February 6, 2006
PDF | More
JUDGMENT regarding 43 Notice of Case Dismissal. Pursuant to the parties' joint stipulation for dismissal without prejudice (filing 43) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41,IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice, each party tobear its own attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by Judge Richard G. Kopf on 2/6/2006. (JAR)