Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

05-259 - Robinson v. Omaha Police Department et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
05-259 - Robinson v. Omaha Police Department et al
June 10, 2005
PDF | More
005. copies mailed(MKR, )PRISONER PAYMENT ORDER- That when funds exist in the plaintiff's prison trust account, the plaintiff's institution shall collect them and remit them to the court subject to the limitations set forth in this order; the Clerk of court shall serve a copy of this order on the appropriate officer at the plaintiff's institution; the plaintiff shall keep the court informed of his current address at all times while this case is pending. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett on 6/10/2
October 24, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER on Initial Review - The Clerk of Court is directed to provide the plaintiff with a copy of this order and one summons form along with one Form-285. Plaintiff is directed to complete summons forms and return to court for service. ***Set/Reset All Deadlines: Service of Summons due by 2/22/2006. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett on 10/24/2005. (JAR)
March 22, 2006
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is before the court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) which establishes a time limit for service of process on the defendant in a civil case. The court notified the plaintiff of the deadline for service of process on the defendants in the court's Order on Initial Review. Because the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Clerk of Court provided forms for service of process to the plaintiff to complete and return to the court so that the U.S. Marshal could serve the defendants. The plaintiff did not return the forms for service of process, and the deadline expired. In addition, it appears to the court that this case has been abandoned, as mail from the court to the plaintiff has been returned, and the plaintiff has not informed the court of his current address. A plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court informed of his or her current address at all times while the plaintiff's case is pending, as the court advised the plaintiff in the court's Prisoner Payment Order and inthe Order on Initial Review. Therefore, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), the plaintiff's complaint and the aboveentitled action are dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Richard G. Kopf on 3/22/2006. (JAR)