Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

12-324 - Tama Plastic Industry v. Pritchett Twine & Net Wrap, LLC et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
12-324 - Tama Plastic Industry v. Pritchett Twine & Net Wrap, LLC et al
May 25, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion for Sanctions. (See order for specific details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 5/25/2012. (REO) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/11/2012.]
August 3, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: For these reasons, the Court ORDERS the parties to file a joint statement by August 10, 2012, showing cause why this action should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska after the Court promptly resolves the motions pending at dockets 124, 161, and 168. If the parties cannot agree on the contents of a joint statement, they are ordered to file competing submissions by that date. If this Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, the Pritchett Defendants' Motion to Stay this Litigation, 69, would be denied as moot on this Court's docket but would remain pending for the transferee court to resolve ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/3/2012.(DW) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/11/2012.]
August 3, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER: In light of Tama's concern, the Court has temporarily restricted the access of its Order denying Tama's request for a preliminary injunction to case participants. [Dkt. 169.] For the time being, the parties should treat that Order as confidential material pursuant to their joint protective order. [Dkt. 42.] Given the strong presumption in favor of public access to court filings, however, the Court ORDERS each party to file a statement by August 8, 2012, specifically setting forth any portion of the Order the party believes should be maintained under seal, what harm will result from disclosure, why that harm is the sort that presents a legal justification for secrecy, and what legal precedent supports maintaining that portion under seal. The Court notes that the precedent it details herein describes the standards for sealing documents submitted to the Court, not for sealing portions of a Court's order. The Court found no authority for permanently sealing access to an order in the short time it had to address this issue. Therefore, if a party desires to maintain any portion of the Order under seal, it should also direct the Court to applicable legal authority for doing so, keeping in mind that the Court's Order conveyed the dispositive information that was necessary to address the arguments raised by the parties ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/3/2012.(DW)[Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/11/2012.]
August 9, 2012
PDF | More
ENTRY - To comply with the Seventh Circuit's guidance on this issue, the Court will issue an amended order denying Tama's request for a preliminary injunction that contains oblique references to the confidential information. Only the challenged paragraph and the title of the amended order will be altered from the previously issued order. The Clerk is directed to maintain the previously issued order, [dkt. 169], under seal and the parties should treat it as confidential material pursuant to their joint protective order, [dkt. 42]. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/9/2012. (JKS) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/11/2012.]
August 9, 2012
PDF | More
AMENDED ORDER Denying Request For Preliminary Injunction - For the reasons detailed herein, the Court STRIKES Mr. Chi's affidavit, [dkt. 72], and GRANTS Tama's Motion to Consider Arguments Related to Defendants' Surreply, [dkt. 116]. The Court DENIES Tama's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction based on its analysis of the applicable factors. [Dkt. 58.] Pritchett's Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Reexamination of the Patent-in-Suit, [dkt. 69], remains UNDER ADVISEMENT. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/9/2012. (JKS) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/11/2012.]
September 11, 2012
PDF | More
CLOSED TRANSFER - Tama's request that this Court give preclusive effect to its venue stipulation with the Pritchett Defendants is denied. [Dkt. 109.] After considering the applicable factors and the parties' responses to the Court's proposed transfer, the Court concludes it is appropriate to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. For the reasons detailed herein, the interest of justice factor is dispositive, and the additional factors either do not weigh against transfer or further support it. Because the District of Nebraska is the superior forum for this litigation, the Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this action to that Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1404 (a). The Pritchett Defendants' Motion to Stay Litigation will remain pending for the transferee court to rule on, although it will be terminated as a pending motion on this Court's docket. Any previously ordered dates and deadlines are VACATED and any other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/11/2012. (JKS) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/11/2012.]
October 31, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER granting 214 Motion to Extend. Plaintiff may file its response to the pending Motion for Protective Order by November 12, 2012. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
November 17, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER: Defendants' reply in support of their Motion for Protective Order (Filing No. 211), and their response to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, (Filing No. 218), shall be filed on or before December 6, 2012.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
January 24, 2013
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding pending motions: 1) Defendants' motions to stay (Filings No. 69 & 216) are granted in part and denied in part. Further progression of this case is stayed except as stated in this order.2) Defendant's motion for a protective order, (Filing No. 211) is denied.3) Plaintiff's motion to compel (Filing No. 218) is granted. To the extent Pritchett must produce names of its customers, that information shall be designated "Attorneys' Eyes Only" pursuant to the current Protective Order.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
March 14, 2013
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 237 Motion for Leave to withdraw Arthur S. Robinson, Jr. as counsel for Defendants/Counterclaimants Pritchett Twine & Net Wrap, LLC and Joseph Jerald Pritchett a/k/a Jerald Pritchett. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB)
August 2, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER regarding Memorandum and Order236. The court stayed the case on January 24, 2013, to allow the United States Patent and Trademark Office to render an opinion in a reexamination proceeding. Counsel shall file a joint status report concerning the status of this case on August 20, 2013, and every 90 days thereafter, such report to include the position(s) of counsel concerning whether the stay should continue in effect or whether the stay should be lifted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JAB)
October 15, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER granting 261 Motion to Extend Deadlines in Case Management Plan. The deadlines set in the court's 9/18/13 Order 250 and the Revised Case Management Plan 249 referenced within, remain in effect with the exception of the amendments as set forth in this order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF)
January 14, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER granting 276 Motion to Extend. The parties shall have until 2/21/2014 to file Markman Reply Briefs. The Markman Hearing is rescheduled for 3/13/2014 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, Roman L. Hruska Federal Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF)
March 14, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER that this matter is before the court following a telephone conference with counsel on March 14, 2014. The parties shall have until April 30, 2014, to file Markman Reply Briefs. The Markman Hearing is rescheduled for May 20, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon in Courtroom No. 3, Third Floor, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB, )
June 11, 2014
PDF | More
VACATED (SEE FILING 330 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER wherein the Court adopts certain claim constructions regarding "Longitudinal Polyolefin Ribbons," "Calculated Ribbon Length," "Knitted with" terms, "Reduced Lateral Shrinkage," "Each of Said Triangles Having a Base Dimension and a Height Dimension," "Height Dimension Defining a Distance Between Said Adjacent Longitudinal Ribbons," and "Calculating Ribbon Length which is Based on Said Height Dimension." Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JSF) Modified on 11/6/2014 (Zwart, Cheryl).
June 30, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER granting 313 Motion (Stipulation) to Amend Case Management Plan. The deadlines set in the court's September 18, 2013, Order (Filing No. 250), the Revised Case Management Plan (Filing No. 249), and the Order dated October 15, 2013 (Filing No. 262), remain in effect with the exception of amendments O, Q, R, T, U, R-1, S, V, W, X, Z, and Y. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (KMG)
July 15, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 311 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JSF)
September 26, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER denying 319 Motion to Modify Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
November 6, 2014
PDF | More
FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KMG)
July 28, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER TO WITHDRAW EXHIBITS OR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY EXHITS SHOULD NOT BE DESTROYED as to Plaintiff Tama Plastic Industry. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR)
July 28, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER TO WITHDRAW EXHIBITS OR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY EXHITS SHOULD NOT BE DESTROYED as to Defendant Pritchett Twine & Net Wrap, LLC. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR)