Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-086 - USA v. Hernandez-Hernandez


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-086 - USA v. Hernandez-Hernandez
April 14, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER granting the Defendant Hernandez-Hernandez's 19 Motion for an extension of time. Hernandez-Hernandez is given until on or before May 6, 2015, in which to file pretrial motions pursuant to the progression order. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between April 14, 2015, and May 6, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional timeto adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B) as to Yazmani Hernandez-Hernandez (1). Pretrial Motion Deadline set for 5/6/2015. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. ( MKR)
May 13, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER of Detention pending trial as to defendant Yazmani Hernandez-Hernandez. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
June 9, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER granting Hernandez-Hernandez's 29 Motion to Continue trial as to Yazmani Hernandez-Hernandez (1). Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for July 20, 2015, before Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between June 9, 2015, and July 20, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. ( MKR )
September 3, 2015
PDF | More
JUDGMENT as to Yazmani Hernandez-Hernandez (1), Count 1 - Defendant pleaded guilty to count I of the Indictment and is hereby sentenced to time served; supervised release for a term of one (1) year; $100.00 special assessment as to defendant Yazmani Hernandez-Hernandez. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (1 Certified copy to USM) (ADB)
March 24, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER that this matter is before the court on the defendant's request for modification of his conditions of supervised release due to his concurrent supervision by the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Filing No. 48. After consultation with the U.S. Probation Office the court finds that no modification of the court's conditions of supervised release is necessary. The court notes that the ICE supervision refers to the continued supervision by the U.S. Probation Office. If the double reporting requirements of the two supervisions present a problem to the defendant the U.S. Probation Office may adjust its reporting requirement as it deems appropriate as to defendant Yazmani Hernandez-Hernandez. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)