Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-027 - USA v. Nunez


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-027 - USA v. Nunez
February 3, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL - CJA Counsel is appointed to represent the defendant in this matter as to defendant Michael Nunez. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (SLP)
February 3, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER of Detention pending trial as to defendant Michael Nunez. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (SLP)
March 4, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER as to defendant Michael Nunez. Defendant's motion for an extension of time (Filing No. 21) is granted. The defendant is given until on or before April 5, 2016, in which to file pretrial motions. The time between March 4, 2016, and April 5, 2016, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Trial of this matter scheduled for March 28, 2016, is canceled and will be rescheduled following the disposition of any pretrial motions or the expiration of the pretrial motion deadline. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MBM)
April 6, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER Defendant Nunez's motion for an extension of time (Filing No. 24) is granted. Nunez is given until on or before April 28, 2016, in which to file pretrial motions pursuant to the progression order. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between April 6, 2016, and April 28, 2016, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (LAC)
June 28, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER that the United States' Amended Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture 34 is hereby sustained. Based upon the Forfeiture Allegation of the Indictment and the Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States is hereby authorized to seize $7,150.00. The Defendant's interest in the aforementioned currency is hereby forfeited to the United States for disposition in accordance with the law, subject to the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1). Upon adjudication of all third-party interests, this Court will enter a Final Order of Forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), in which all interests will be addressed as to Michael Nunez (1). Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (1 Certified copy to USM) (ADB)
September 1, 2016
PDF | More
JUDGMENT as to Michael Nunez (1), Count 1 - Defendant pleaded guilty to count I of the Indictment and is committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of one hundred twenty (120) months; 5 years supervised release with special conditions; $100.00 special assessment as to defendant Michael Nunez. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (4 Certified copies to USM) (ADB)
September 6, 2016
PDF | More
FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE that the Plaintiff's Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture is hereby sustained. All right, title and interest in and to the $7,150.00 in United States currency held by any person or entity are hereby forever barred and foreclosed. The $7,150.00 in United States currency be, and the same hereby is, forfeited to the United States of America. The United States is directed to dispose of said property in accordance with law as to Michael Nunez (1). Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (1 Certified copy to USM) (ADB)
July 31, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's motions for appointment of counsel and for status (Filing No. 47, Filing No. 48 and Filing No. 50) are denied as to Michael Nunez. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)( TCL)
January 17, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: On initial review, the court finds that summary dismissal is not appropriate. The United States shall file an answer to the defendant's Section 2255 motion within 21 days of the date of this Order as to defendant Michael Nunez. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)