Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-069 - Bartunek v. eFrame, LLC


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-069 - Bartunek v. eFrame, LLC
June 2, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's motion (Filing 36) to file an amended brief in opposition to the pending motion for summary judgment (Filing 23) filed by defendant Marco Technologies, LLC, is granted, and the amended brief and exhibits contained in Filing 36 are accepted, will be considered as Plaintiff's operative response to defendant Marco's motion for summary judgment, and shall supersede Plaintiff's original response (Filing 26) to Marco's motion for summary judgment. Defendant Marco Technologies, LLC, may reply to Plaintiff's amended response within 10 days of the date of this order, after which its motion for summary judgment (Filing 23) shall be ripe for resolution. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLF)
July 27, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER - that Defendant eFrame's motion, (Filing No. 49), is granted, and its deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended to August 25, 2016. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
October 6, 2016
PDF | More
s to defendants Nyffeler and Marco Technologies, LLC, shall be withheld pending the resolution of this case as to the remaining defendant, eFrame, LLC. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Defendant Nyffeler's motion to dismiss (Filing 16) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is granted, and defendant Nyffeler is dismissed from this case. The plaintiff's motion to introduce evidence (Filing 52) is denied, and the materials attached to such motion shall not be considered. The motion for summary judgment (Filing 23) filed by defendant Marco Technologies, LLC, is granted, and Marco is no longer a party to this case. Judgment a
November 8, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER that the plaintiff's motion to reconsider (filing 56) is denied. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
January 31, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER - The motion to withdraw filed by Margaret C. Hershiser, Kristin M.V. Krueger, and Koley Jessen P.C., L.L.O. as counsel of record for eFrame, LLC (Filing No. 70), is granted. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Defendant at eFrame, LLC, c/o Jerry Pont, 12020 Shamrock Plaza, Suite 105, Omaha, Nebraska 68154. The clerk shall set a case management deadline of March 2, 2017 to check on the status of case progression. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copies mailed as directed) (KLF)
May 10, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER that Defendant eFrame, LLC, a limited liability company, cannot litigate its action in this forum without representation by licensed counsel. Knoefler v. United Bank of Bismarck, 20 F.3d 347, 347-48 (8th Cir. 1994). On or before June 9, 2017, Defendant eFrame, LLC shall obtain the services of counsel and have that attorney file an appearance on its behalf, in the absence of which the court may file an entry and/or judgment of default against it without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copies mailed as directed) (ADB)
July 11, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting 78 Motion to Continue and granting 80 Motion to Continue. Depositions due November 6, 2017. All motions to amend the pleadings shall be filed on or before October 9, 2017. Motions to compel discovery shall be filed on or before November 20, 2017. All dispositive motions shall be filed on or before December 6, 2017. Pretrial Conference set for 3/13/2018 at 10:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. If a plaintiff is held in an institution, the pretrial conference will be by telephone. In that case, Defense counsel shall contact the plaintiff's institution in advance and arrange to initiate and place the conference call. The trial date will be set by the Magistrate Judge at the time of the Final Pretrial Conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)