Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-157 - Edwards v. Colvin

Download Files


Document in Context
16-157 - Edwards v. Colvin
April 14, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (filing 2) is granted, and the complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this memorandum and order and a copy of General Order No. 2015-05, together with three summons forms and three copies of Form 285, to the plaintiff's attorney of record for service of process on the United States. If requested to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve all process in this case without prepayment of fees from the plaintiff. In making such a request, plaintiff's counsel must complete the Marshal's Form 285, to be submitted to the Marshal with the completed summons forms and copies of the complaint. Without those forms, service of process by the Marshal cannot occur. This order is entered without prejudice to the Court later entering an order taxing costs in this case. No one, including any plaintiff, is relieved by this order from the obligation to pay or to reimburse taxable costs after this action is over. The plaintiff's "Request from Requirement to Participate in the CM/ECF Filing System" (filing 4) is denied. The plaintiff's counsel is directed to comply with NECivR 5.1 when filing documents in this case. Notice of remaining filings in this case will be provided to counsel electronically. The Clerk of the Court is directed to refuse future filings in this case that are presented nonelectronically unless they fall within the scope of NECivR 5.1(c). Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copies mailed as directed) (LAC)
September 8, 2016
PDF | More
R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (LAC)ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE that the plaintiff's counsel shall show cause, on or before September 26, 2016, why this case should not be dismissed as moot. Progression of this case is stayed pending substitution of a proper plaintiff pursuant to Fed.