Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-258 - Friedman v. National Indemnity Company


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-258 - Friedman v. National Indemnity Company
July 15, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER- Plaintiff's motion to commence discovery (Filing No. 9), is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
July 15, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, (Filing No. 11), is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
November 19, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER setting briefing deadlines on Motions to 35,36, and 31. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
January 26, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER - The telephone conference scheduled for January 27, 2017 is continued pending further order of the court. On or before February 6, 2017, the parties shall contact the court to set a conference for discussing the pending discovery issues and further progression of this case. The clerk shall send a courtesy copy of this order to Terry A. White at [email protected] Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party and as directed)(GJG)
March 21, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER - All written discovery to corroborate or refute the description of Plaintiff's job, and all discovery (written or deposition) as to the actual hours Plaintiff worked is stayed pending a ruling on whether, assuming all inferences in favor of Plaintiff, Plaintiff's job was exempt or non-exempt. This paragraph shall not be construed as foreclosing the parties from performing written discovery and deposing or re-deposing any witness following the summary judgment ruling as to all issues of the case, including the issue of Plaintiff's job description and responsibilities. The deposition discovery as to the initial exempt/non-exempt issue shall be completed on or before August 15, 2017. On or before September 15, 2017, the parties shall file their respective cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of whether Plaintiff can present facts supporting an FLSA claim for unlawful classification as an exempt employee. Responses shall be filed within 20 days thereafter. No reply shall be filed absent leave of the court for good cause shown. Plaintiff's motions to compel, (Filing Nos. 31, 35, and 36), are denied without prejudice to re-filing, if necessary, after the court rules on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment on the exempt/non-exempt issue. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG)
April 13, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Friedman's motion for partial summary judgment (filing 64) is denied. National Indemnity's motion for partial summary judgment (filing 61) is granted. This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for case progression. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (LKO)