Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-479 - Moss v. Frakes


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-479 - Moss v. Frakes
October 25, 2016
PDF | More
rning Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Gove
November 1, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER - Upon initial review of the Petition (Filing No. 1), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims are potentially cognizable in federal court. By December 16, 2016, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or steave of the court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)ate court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 16, 2016: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondent elects to file a motion for summary judgment, the following procedures must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. If Respondent elects to file an answer, the following procedures must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 17, 2017: check for Respondents answer and separate brief. No discovery shall be undertaken without l
January 25, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER - The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file reply to Respondent's answer (filing no. 10) is granted in part and denied in part. The Petitioner's responsive brief to the Respondent's answer is due on or before March 17, 2017. The Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (filing no. 11) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
May 5, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - the motion for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (filing no. 1) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. No certificate of appealability has been or will be issued. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
May 16, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER - The petitioner may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. As recited in the memorandum and order, as well as the judgment, and to be triply obvious, no certificate of appealability has been or will be issued. The Clerk shall process the appeal. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)