Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-521 - Vasquez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-521 - Vasquez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
February 13, 2018
PDF | More
PROTECTIVE ORDER - After due consideration, the request for protective order (Filing No. 54) is granted. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff, Sean Vasquez, as well as his agents and representatives, shall adhere to and are hereby commanded to comply with all of the provisions of this Protective Order relating to production of the VRC Billing Guidelines; and specifically, they are commanded to comply with all of the Terms and Conditions, see order for terms and conditions. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
March 9, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Expert Witness Karen Stricklett (Filing No. 53) and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Evidence of Psychological Evaluation Performed by Rosanna M. Jones-Thurman (Filing No. 65). For the reasons stated on the record, the Court finds that Defendant's late disclosure of Karen Stricklett's report was substantially justified and harmless. The Court further finds that Defendant has shown good cause for the timing of the disclosure. As to Rosanna M. Jones-Thurman, she has not been designated as an expert witness in this case and will not be testifying in this case. Her information was used by Dr. Davis in conducting his Rule 35 examination of Plaintiff. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)