Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-021 - Dubray v. Hansen


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-021 - Dubray v. Hansen
January 31, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER - Petitioner is directed to submit the $5.00 fee to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: March 2, 2017: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with form as directed)(GJG)
February 6, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 4 ) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
February 21, 2017
PDF | More
ed to pro se party) (LAC)MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the Petition (Filing No. 1), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims, as limited above, are potentially cognizable in federal court. The other claims are dismissed with prejudice. By March 24, 2017, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 24, 2017: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondent elects to file a motion for summary judgment, the following procedures must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. If Respondent elects to file an answer, the following procedures must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 27, 2017: check for Respondent's answer and separate brief. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mail
June 27, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (filing no. 16) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
June 30, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER that Petitioner's second motion to appoint counsel (filing no. 19) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (CS)
August 18, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is denied and dismissed with prejudice. No certificate of appealability has been or will be issued. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)