Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-330 - Luciano v. Beockner et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-330 - Luciano v. Beockner et al
September 15, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
January 19, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff's Motion to Continue (filing no. 9) is granted. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file an Amended Complaint and, if diversity jurisdiction is asserted, sufficient evidence showing the amount in controversy is greater than $75,000.00. Failure to file a response in accordance with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice to Plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: February 20, 2018: deadline for Plaintiff to file Amended Complaint and evidence of diversity jurisdiction. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)