Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-488 - Hancock el. v. Lincoln Police Department et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-488 - Hancock el. v. Lincoln Police Department et al
January 9, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (Filing No. 2), is granted. The filing fee shall be collected and remitted, as funds exist, in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid, the prisoner shall be obligated to pay, and the agency having custody of the prisoner shall forward to the clerk of the court, 20 percent of the preceding month's income in such months as the account exceeds $10.00. The clerk of the court shall serve a copy of this order on the appropriate financial officer for Plaintiff's current institution. The next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Plaintiff's current institution; e-mailed to Finance) (KLF)
April 6, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Request to Re-Open Case (Filing No. 13), liberally construed as a motion for relief from judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), is granted. The court's Judgment entered on January 25, 2018 (Filing No. 12), is vacated and this case is reinstated to the active docket. Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement and Amend Complaint (Filing No. 14) is denied. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline with the following text: May 7, 2018: check for completion of initial review. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
May 29, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff will have 30 days in which to file an Amended Complaint which states a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's failure to file an Amended Complaint in accordance with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Plaintiff's request for a status report (Filing 16) is denied withoutprejudice. Plaintiff's motion to amend (Filing 18) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for copies (Filing 19) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for summonses (Filing 20) is denied without prejudice. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline using the following text: June 28, 2018: check for amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
June 7, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (Filing No. 22) is granted, and, accordingly, that: Plaintiff shall have an additional 30 days in which to file an Amended Complaint that states a claim upon which relief may be granted. The clerk of the court is directed to set the following pro se case management deadline: July 30, 2018: check for amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
July 26, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Filing 29) is granted, and thisaction is dismissed without prejudice. Judgment shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)