Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

18-028 - Voss v. The State of Nebraska


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
18-028 - Voss v. The State of Nebraska
January 31, 2018
PDF | More
llowing text: March 1, 2018: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy & AO240 Form mailed to pro se party) (LKO)ORDER - Plaintiff is directed to submit the $400.00 fees to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the fo
March 7, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that to the extent Voss's Notice of Removal may be construed as a civil complaint, it is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay required filing and administrative fees or to request to proceed in forma pauperis within the time prescribed by the court. To the extent Voss is requesting removal of his state criminal case to this court, his request is denied and this case is remanded to the County Court of Brown County, Nebraska. Judgment shall be entered by separate document and the clerk of the court shall proceed to close this file for statistical purposes. The clerk of the court shall send a copy of this Memorandum and Order and of the Judgment to the Clerk of the County Court of Brown County, Nebraska. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Clerk of the County Court of Brown County, Nebraska)(LAC)
April 2, 2018
PDF | More
re 60, are denied in all respects. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)ORDER - that Filing Nos. 9, 10, and 11, liberally construed either asmotions to alter or amend judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59, or as motions for relief from judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedu