Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

08-479 - Espinoza v United States of America


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
08-479 - Espinoza v United States of America
April 13, 2009
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Magistrate Judge W. Daniel Schneider re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Alejandro Espinoza (sco)
June 8, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack that the findings and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted, and Petitioners Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence filed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 is DENIED and this matter is dismissed. (aml)
September 30, 2009
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Magistrate Judge W. Daniel Schneider re 27 MOTION to Alter Judgment filed by Alejandro Espinoza (sco)
December 2, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack adopting Report and Recommendations re 34 Report and Recommendations; denying 27 Motion to Alter Judgment (ln)
August 29, 2012
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Magistrate Judge W. Daniel Schneider on Petitioner's Brady claim (sco)
January 23, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack ADOPTING 83 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Alejandro Espinoza (jn) Modified document type on 4/4/2017 (yc).
July 15, 2014
PDF | More
on 3/31/2017 (bc).MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack DENYING 123 MOTION to Disqualify Judge, AND DISMISSING for lack of jurisdiction 120 MOTION to Set Aside Judgment (yc) Modified text on 7/15/2014 (yc). Modified document type
February 18, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack denying 127 MOTION to Amend or Make Additional Findings and to Alter or Amend Judgment and denying as moot 129 MOTION For a Ruling on His Motion to Amend or Make Additional Findings and to Alter or Amend Judgment (jn) Modified document type on 3/29/2017 (bc).
October 8, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER TO ANSWER by Chief Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen. The United States is directed to file and serve a response to Defendants Motion to Set Aside Judgment within 23 days of the entry of this Order, specifically addressing the three arguments identified in the order of remand, and Plaintiff shall have 17 days after the response is filed to file a reply, if any. (KBM)
December 18, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Chief Magistrate Judge Karen B. Molzen that Petitioners Motion to Set Aside Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) (Doc. 194 in CR 04-852) be denied. Objections to R&R due by 1/7/2016. (KBM)
March 30, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER OVERRULING PETITIONER ESPINOZA'S OBJECTION TO CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE MOLZEN'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by District Judge Robert C. Brack overruling 151 Objections to Report and Recommendations filed by Alejandro Espinoza; It is further ordered 148 Report and Recommendations is hereby adopted; It is further ordered 138 Motion to Appoint Counsel, 139 Motion to Expedite, 144 MOTION for an Evidentiary Hearing and 154 Motion to Expedite are hereby denied; It is further ordered that 120 Espinoza's motion to set aside judgment is hereby denied (jn) Modified filed date on 3/31/2016 (jn).