Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

09-2619 - USA v. Martinez


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
09-2619 - USA v. Martinez
August 2, 2011
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James O. Browning granting in part and denying in part MOTION for Downward Departure Variance as to Ernie Martinez 41 (dmw)
August 8, 2011
PDF | More
JUDGMENT by District Judge James O. Browning as to Defendant Ernie Martinez. (kw)
July 15, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER TO ANSWER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. The United States' Answer is due no later than August 8, 2016. (gc)
July 21, 2016
PDF | More
STIPULATED ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 65 United States' Unopposed Amended Motion for Extension of Time until October 7, 2016, to Answer 58 and 62 Ernie Martinez's Petition under section 2255, and DENYING as moot 64 United States' original Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (am)
July 28, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 67 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief. Supplemental Brief due by July 29, 2016. (gc)
November 7, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY RULING SHOULD NOT BE STAYED PENDING RULING IN BECKLES by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. The parties' show-cause responses are due by November 18, 2016. (sg)
November 18, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar STAYING Ruling on 62 Mr. Martinez's Motion Under Section 2255 Pending a Decision in United States v. Beckles. (am)
March 13, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar LIFTING stay and DIRECTING the parties to confer and file a joint statement in light of Beckles no later than March 27, 2017. (am)
March 31, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James O. Browning, the Defendant/Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, (CIV Doc. 5), is dismissed with prejudice, the Defendant/Movant's Motion to Vacate and Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, 58 is dismissed with prejudice ; and the Defendant/Movant's Supplemental Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, (CIV Doc. 12), is dismissed with prejudice (meq)