Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-966 - USA v. Channon et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-966 - USA v. Channon et al
July 22, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Brandi Channon's Motion To Suppress Statements 52 is DENIED. (mjr)
September 22, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Defendants' Joint Motion for a Bill of Particulars 50 is DENIED; Defendants' Joint Motion To Suppress Computer Evidence 104 is DENIED; Defendants' Joint Motion for Specification of Co-Conspirator Statements and a Pre-Trial Hearing on the Statements' Admissibility 49 is DENIED; Defendant's Motion To Sever Counts 7-10 from Count 11 and Supporting Authorities 54 is DENIED; Defendants' Motion To Dismiss for Selective Prosecution and Supporting Authorities 51 is DENIED; Defendants' Joint Motion To Dismiss 56 is DENIED; Defendants' Motion To Sever Defendants and Supporting Authorities 55 is DENIED. (mjr)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Defendants' Joint Motion for a Bill of Particulars 50 is DENIED; Defendants' Joint Motion To Suppress Computer Evidence 104 is DENIED; Defendants' Joint Motion for Specification of Co-Conspirator Statements and a Pre-Trial Hearing on the Statements' Admissibility 49 is DENIED; Defendant's Motion To Sever Counts 7-10 from Count 11 and Supporting Authorities 54 is DENIED; Defendants' Motion To Dismiss for Selective Prosecution and Supporting Authorities 51 is DENIED; Defendants' Joint Motion To Dismiss 56 is DENIED; Defendants' Motion To Sever Defendants and Supporting Authorities 55 is DENIED. (mjr)
January 8, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) The Government will be allowed to present expert testimony by Jane Bales as described in the Government's Notice of Intention To Offer Expert Testimony (Jane Bales) [Doc.58]; interpreting this notice and Defendants' response as the Government's opposed motion to allow such testimony, the Government's motion is GRANTED; and 2) The Government will be allowed to present expert testimony by Jeffrey Moon as described in the Government's Notice of Intention To Offer Expert Testimony (Jeffrey Moon) [Doc. 103]; interpreting this notice and Defendants' response as the Government's opposed motion to allow such testimony, the Government's motion is GRANTED. (mjr)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) The Government will be allowed to present expert testimony by Jane Bales as described in the Government's Notice of Intention To Offer Expert Testimony (Jane Bales) [Doc.58]; interpreting this notice and Defendants' response as the Government's opposed motion to allow such testimony, the Government's motion is GRANTED; and 2) The Government will be allowed to present expert testimony by Jeffrey Moon as described in the Government's Notice of Intention To Offer Expert Testimony (Jeffrey Moon) [Doc. 103]; interpreting this notice and Defendants' response as the Government's opposed motion to allow such testimony, the Government's motion is GRANTED. (mjr)
August 21, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion To Dismiss Indictment 177 is DENIED. (mjr)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion To Dismiss Indictment 177 is DENIED. (mjr)
December 2, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Motion To Exclude Testimony by Defendant Matthew Channon's Proposed Expert Witness or in the Alternative To Require Defendant's Prompt Compliance with Rule 16(B)(1)(C) [Doc. 185] is DENIED as moot; Motion To Exclude Expert Testimony on "Spreadsheet Fallacies" and "Financial Accounting Treatment of 'Max Perks' Rewards" [Doc. 204] is DENIED as moot; and Consolidated Motion To Exclude Testimony by Defendant's Expert Accounting Witness [Doc. 235] is DENIED. (mjr)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Motion To Exclude Testimony by Defendant Matthew Channon's Proposed Expert Witness or in the Alternative To Require Defendant's Prompt Compliance with Rule 16(B)(1)(C) [Doc. 185] is DENIED as moot; Motion To Exclude Expert Testimony on "Spreadsheet Fallacies" and "Financial Accounting Treatment of 'Max Perks' Rewards" [Doc. 204] is DENIED as moot; and Consolidated Motion To Exclude Testimony by Defendant's Expert Accounting Witness [Doc. 235] is DENIED. (mjr)
January 4, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion for Discovery UnderFed. R. Crim. P. 16 and Fed. R. Evid. 803 [Doc. 260] is DENIED. (mjr)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion for Discovery UnderFed. R. Crim. P. 16 and Fed. R. Evid. 803 [Doc. 260] is DENIED. (mjr)
January 12, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Defendants' Motion To Strike Surplusage from the Second Superseding Indictment 274 is GRANTED, and United States' Motion To Strike as Untimely Defendants' Motion To Strike Surplusage 278 is DENIED. (mjr)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Defendants' Motion To Strike Surplusage from the Second Superseding Indictment 274 is GRANTED, and United States' Motion To Strike as Untimely Defendants' Motion To Strike Surplusage 278 is DENIED. (mjr)
January 12, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motions to exclude Daubert Exhibits 1 and 2 as summaries under Rule 1006 are denied. (mjr)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motions to exclude Daubert Exhibits 1 and 2 as summaries under Rule 1006 are denied. (mjr)
December 16, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera granting 376 MOTION for Continuation of Conditions of Release Pending Appeal. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Mr. Channon's Motion for Release Pending Appeal [Doc. 376] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Channon must continue to adhere to the conditions of release set forth in Doc. 13. (gr)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera granting 376 MOTION for Continuation of Conditions of Release Pending Appeal. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Mr. Channon's Motion for Release Pending Appeal [Doc. 376] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Channon must continue to adhere to the conditions of release set forth in Doc. 13. (gr)