Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-226 - Sweat v. City of Las Cruces et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-226 - Sweat v. City of Las Cruces et al
March 23, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER to Cure Deficiency by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Plaintiff shall cure deficiency by April 22, 2015. (ect)
April 28, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING extension of time to respond to 5 Order to Cure Deficiency. The deadline for Plaintiff to cure the designated deficiency is EXTENDED to May 28, 2015. (ect)
May 14, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 13 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (ect)
May 28, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 (am)
August 17, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack; Plaintiff's eighth amendment claim is dismissed. (jn) Modified document type on 3/30/2017 (jn).
September 17, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 27 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Appoint Counsel. (gc) Modified document to opinion on 3/28/2017 (jn).
November 3, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar regarding defense of qualified immunity. Defendants are ORDERED to file their motion on qualified immunity by January 15, 2016, or show cause why they cannot. (gc)
March 11, 2016
PDF | More
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMEND DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART 48 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity. Objections to PF&RD are due no later than March 28, 2016. (am)
March 11, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 53 Defendants' Motion to Strike 52 Plaintiff's Surreply. (am)
April 21, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack overruling Defendant's 58 Objections 55 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity filed by FNU Sanchez, Paul Lujan, Jaime Montoya, Miranda Baker, City of Las Cruces; It is further ordered that the 55 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS are adopted; It is further ordered that 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity filed by FNU Sanchez, Paul Lujan, Jaime Montoya, Miranda Baker, City of Las Cruces is granted in part and denied in part (jn) Modified document type on 3/28/2017 (jjs).
April 25, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar REFERRING case to Court's pro bono panel (am)
June 16, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY OF PHOTOGRAPHS no later than July 18, 2016, by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. (am)
July 28, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 73 Defendants' Motion to Strike 72 Plaintiff's Surreply to 68 Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity. (am)
July 28, 2016
PDF | More
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMEND DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to DENY 65 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, GRANT 68 Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity, DISMISS with prejudice the remaining federal claim, and DISMISS without prejudice the state-law claims. Objections to PF&RD due by August 15, 2016. (am)
August 30, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Robert C. Brack overruling 84 Memorandum in Opposition and adopting 81 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is further order 65 MOTION for Summary Judgment and 82 MOTION for Summary Judgment are denied and 68 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity and Memorandum in Support filed by FNU Sanchez, Paul Lujan, Jaime Montoya, Miranda Baker, City of Las Cruces, 65 MOTION for Summary Jud is granted. 83 MOTION to Strike is denied as moot. Plaintiff's one remaining federal claim is dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiff's state-law claims are dismissed without prejudice (jn) Modified document to opinion on 3/28/2017 (jn).
October 12, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 99 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (am)