Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-1315 - Crow et al v. Village of Ruidoso et al

Download Files


Document in Context
16-1315 - Crow et al v. Village of Ruidoso et al
August 7, 2017
PDF | More
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. It is hereby ordered that 28 Defendants' Motion to Strike is DENIED. It is hereby recommended that 20 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment be GRANTED. Objections to PF&RD due by August 21, 2017. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (sg)
September 30, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James O. Browning adopting the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition 33, granting the Defendants' Motion and Memorandum of Law to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment Against Plaintiffs' Complaint and for Qualified Immunity 20, and dismissing action with prejudice. (kw)