Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

07-1187 - Vacek v. Court of Appeals et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
07-1187 - Vacek v. Court of Appeals et al
April 28, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Bruce D. Black dismissing certain of Plaintiff's claims; denying in part and holding in abeyance in part 68 Third MOTION for Leave to File Second Amend Complaint - Revision C filed by Dan L Vacek; and denying 69 First MOTION to Change Venue filed by Dan L Vacek. (an)
June 16, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Bruce D. Black granting 33 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and dismissing certain Defendants; and denying the following motions: 63 MOTION to Strike, 67 MOTION to Strike, 72 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 81 MOTION to Reopen Case and for Reconsideration, 85 First MOTION for Reconsideration, and 87 MOTION for Leave to File. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing on or before 7/7/2008 why his remaining claims should not be dismissed. (an)
August 7, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION IN SUPPORT OF DISMISSAL by District Judge Bruce D. Black re: 91 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, 78 MOTION for Discovery Motion to Allow Interrogatories, Discovery, Depositions and 46 Answer to Amended Complaint/Motion of the County Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; The Court finds Defendants' Motion has legal support and Plaintiff's claims must be dismissed; THEREFORE, all claims against the County Defendants should be dismissed with prejudice; See Memorandum Opinion for specifics. (pz)